Team+II+Page

=TEAM II - Saphier Responses:=

**These are two embedded files and links containing the Marshall and Danielson rubrics.**


[] []

=Presentation notes=

Education Evaluation Committee July 26, 2011 Summary of Jon Saphier’s __How to make supervision and evaluation really work__ Maria Bulson, Joseph Markow, Scott Fellows


 * __Commonalities__**


 * Evaluation versus supervision** goals (read excerpts from page 9)

p. 73 The purpose of **evaluation** is to maintain high, minimum standards of performance.

p. 73 The purpose of **supervision** is to provide frequent, high quality feedback by someone who knows what he/she is talking about for the purpose of stimulating teachers’ thinking about teaching decisions. And following paragraph: Evaluation defines the floor.


 * Figure 2-1: What do we want our systems for observing teachers to accomplish? (**Distribute page 10)


 * 5 performance expectations of teachers**
 * 1) Classroom teaching
 * 2) Contributing Member of staff
 * 3) Positive Parent and Community Relationships
 * 4) Fulfillment of Routine and Administrative Duties
 * 5) Continuous Professional Growth and Development

p. 129 Compare with Danielson’s. Danielson has a rubric on teacher responsibility. Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities P. 97, 100, 103, 105 Appendix C is a good one-page summary of the four non-teaching performance expectations.
 * Appendix C- Performance Expectations in addition to classroom teaching**

Collegiality Experimentation Reaching out to the knowledge base High expectations Caring, Celebration and humor Traditions Tangible support Protecting what’s important Appreciation and Recognition Respect and Confidence Involvement in Decision-Making Honest, Open Communication
 * 12 norms of behavior** (p. 55)


 * Appendix F – Steps for developing a good supervision evaluation system** (p. 171)
 * similar to the 11 Connecticut Foundational Principles given on 7/26/11 by Nancy Pugliese
 * 3,4,6,8,9 learning on administrator’s part
 * 1,2, 5 Team of school staff and administrators
 * 10,11,12 Observation related


 * Creative evaluation systems in Saphier**

1) Four-year cycle model – p. 69 2) Two-year off year ideas – p. 152-3

Peer observation emphasized for feedback and building collegiality